Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:43

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What was your embarrassing moment in front of your father-in-law as an Indian daughter-in-law?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Rockets To Sign Jabari Smith Jr. To Five-Year Extension - Hoops Rumors
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
2 fans die and an officer is in a coma after Champions League celebrations in France - NBC News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Get ready for June’s strawberry moon - WTOP
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Google's Find Hub finally gets AirTag-like UWB precision finding - Android Police
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Thank you.
Have you ever had sex with sisters?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.